Beyond the Headlines: Unpacking the Complexities of the Governor's FY26 Education Budget

Governor Murphy’s proposed $22 billion education budget may sound impressive, but a closer look reveals both progress and persistent challenges. While funding increases are always welcome, the reality is more nuanced—decades of underfunding left deep scars, and many districts are still struggling to restore essential programs and opportunities.

Let's be clear: any increase in school funding is welcome. While celebrating a 48% increase since 2018, it is crucial to remember that years of stagnant or declining funding forced districts to eliminate crucial art and music programs, limit elective course choices, and increase class sizes, leaving many districts still struggling to restore those essential opportunities.

The proposed ‘tweaks’ to the school funding formula—such as a 3% cap on aid cuts and shifts to multi-year data and actual enrollment figures—offer a degree of stability compared to the disruptive S2 funding reductions. However, the modified cap on reductions still forces difficult choices, potentially impacting core programs and staffing. NJASA supports the shift to multi-year property valuation and income data, as well as the move away from census-based special education funding. Will these changes lead to a more equitable funding model, or merely shift burdens in new ways?

Another major focus of this budget—preschool expansion—raises critical concerns about workforce capacity. Adding seats is essential, but without a pipeline of qualified, certified teachers, we risk compromising program quality. Increased funding for high-impact tutoring is another promising investment, particularly in addressing pandemic learning loss. However, the proposed tax levy flexibility requires careful consideration. While some districts see this as a tool to maintain or restore programs, it risks deepening disparities between wealthy and underfunded communities. NJASA will advocate for safeguards to ensure this measure does not widen educational inequities or place undue financial strain on communities with fewer resources.

While the Governor’s budget reflects a commitment to public education, we must ask tough questions about its long-term sustainability and its impact on New Jersey’s most vulnerable students. Are we truly building a stronger, fairer school system—or merely navigating a landscape of limited resources and difficult trade-offs?

The NJ Department of Education has revealed the district-level funding allocations based on the Governor’s budget proposal. The stakes remain high as we await the adoption of the final FY26 budget. With the upcoming fall elections shaping the future of state leadership, this is not a moment for passive observation. Vigorous advocacy is essential. We must demand transparency, accountability, and a funding system that serves all New Jersey students equitably.

This budget is not the final destination—it’s just the beginning. Our voices and our votes will determine whether this investment creates lasting progress or merely a temporary fix. The future of education in New Jersey depends on what we do next.